Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Age Eternal

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Nomination withdrawn. Yes, I realize there are several delete votes here, but that was before the article on the band was re-created, so those are technically invalid votes now. Personally, I see no need to keep this discussion open if the nominator has withdrawn, so I'm closing it. Non-admin closure. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(((Broken clamshells • Otter chirps)))} 21:46, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Age Eternal

Non-notable album by non-notable band (their article has been deleted twice). Fails WP:MUSIC#Albums. Precious Roy 05:31, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per lack of notability for the band Corpx 05:38, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nn. Iknowyourider (t c) 05:40, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per lack of notablility. The album is not considered notable. --S iva1979^{Talk to me} 06:30, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, per lack of notability Mark E 09:44, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

*Delete does not pass WP:MUSIC --sumnjim ^{talk with me·changes} 12:16, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, nonnotable album. NawlinWiki 14:43, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, because Amazon.com link provided in article shows that it is notable enough to be sold by a major online distributor. I would, however, suggest that some reviews be added. In fact, I did a simple dogpile.com search and found a rather large number of reviews, which seemed to give the album pretty high scores. I have adjusted the article accordingly. Please re-examine it. Sincerely, --Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles^Tally-ho! 15:26, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Selling through Amazon is proof that the album is in print, that's about it. Anyway, Metal Blade is certainly a notable label. The thing is, if the band is not notable enough for its own article, then the album isn't. I follow the dictum—notable band, notable album. Precious Roy 17:04, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  - Comment, perhaps the same problem with the album article was what was wrong with the band article, i.e. that the band would have been notable if the editors had added more references? --Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles^Tally-ho! 17:10, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comment, Im not so sure this is a non-notable band. The article has been speedied twice, yet a quick look on google indicates that may have been due to the state of the article rather than the notability of the band. John Vandenberg 15:37, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletions. -- John Vandenberg 15:37, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I changed my vote from before. The record label which has released their album, Metal Blade Records has released albums for GWAR, Goo Goo Dolls, Slayer, and quite a few more famous bands. Because of that, they pass WP:BIO --sumnjim ^{talk with me·changes} 19:26, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep ~~only if an article is made on the band. Otherwise, delete as non-notable. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(((Broken clamshells • Otter chirps)))} 20:15, 10 July 2007 (UTC)~~ I took the liberty to re-create the article on Middian; take a look at it and expand it if you want. If nothing else, they seem to at least pass WP:RS. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(((Broken clamshells • Otter chirps)))} 20:24, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Nom withdrawn Band's article establishes notability. Precious Roy 21:32, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.